I seem to have a problem with the new fink version

Reading buildlock packages...
        All buildlocks accounted for.
/sw/bin/dpkg-lockwait -i 
/sw/fink/dists/unstable/main/binary-darwin-i386/base/fink_0.30.1-51_darwin-i386.deb
(Reading database ... 326158 files and directories currently installed.)
Preparing to replace fink 0.30.1-51 (using .../fink_0.30.1-51_darwin-i386.deb) 
...
Unpacking replacement fink ...
Setting up fink (0.30.1-51) ...
Checking system... i386-apple-darwin10.8.0
Use of uninitialized value $build in numeric ge (>=) at 
/sw/lib/perl5/Fink/Bootstrap.pm line 146.

Your version of the gcc 3.3 compiler is out of date.  Please update to the 
August 2003 Developer Tools update, or to Xcode, and try again.

/sw/bin/dpkg: error processing fink (--install):
 subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 2
Errors were encountered while processing:
 fink
### execution of /sw/bin/dpkg-lockwait failed, exit code 1
Failed: can't install package fink-0.30.1-51


I am using MacOSX 10.6.8

and have the following compliers installed, I've replaced Xcode but it makes no 
difference

i   xcode                                          3.2.6-1                      
      [virtual package representing the developer tools]


     gcc2.95                                        2.95.2-0                    
       [virtual package representing the gcc 2.95.2 compiler]
     gcc3.1                                         3.1-0                       
       [virtual package representing the gcc 3.1 compiler]
     gcc3.3                                         3.3-0                       
       [virtual package representing the gcc 3.3 compiler]
 i   gcc4.0                                         4.0.1-5494                  
       [virtual package representing the gcc 4.0.1 compiler]
 i   gcc4.2                                         4.2.1-5666                  
       [virtual package representing the gcc 4.2.1 compiler]
(i)  gcc44                                          4.4.6-1000                  
       GNU Compiler Collection Version 4.4
(i)  gcc44-compiler                                 4.4.6-1000                  
       Compiler Binaries for gcc44.
(i)  gcc44-shlibs                                   4.4.6-1000                  
       Shared libraries for gcc4
     gcc45                                          4.5.3-1000                  
       GNU Compiler Collection Version 4.5
(i)  gcc45-compiler                                 4.5.3-1000                  
       Compiler Binaries for gcc45.
(i)  gcc45-shlibs                                   4.5.3-1000                  
       Shared libraries for gcc4


Any suggestions on an appropriate direction to try. I'm sure this is my fault 
somehow.

Don
------------------------------------------------------------------
Professor Don Paul
Superconductivity & Magnetism Group
Department of Physics
University of Warwick
Coventry CV4 7AL
United Kingdom

        email    [email protected]
        tel             024 76 523603
------------------------------------------------------------------



On 29 Jun 2011, at 21:20, Jean-François Mertens wrote:

> 
> On 29 Jun 2011, at 21:52, Brendan Cully wrote:
> 
>> On Wednesday, 29 June 2011 at 02:55, Jean-François Mertens wrote:
>>> On 10.5.8 , both 32bit and 64bit , the build of ghc fails with
>>> 
>>> ./configure --prefix=/sw64
>>> checking for path to top of build tree... dyld: unknown required load
>>> command 0x80000022
>>> 
>>> This is the mark of a binary (utils/ghc-pwd/dist/build/tmp/ghc-pwd
>>> according to config.log) aimed to another OS if I recall correctly..
>>> (and _ who needs a binary to find pwd in configure ...?)
>> 
>> Hmm. The 64-bit one builds fine on 10.6 (I haven't actually tested
>> 32-bit).
> 
> By the "other OS", I did mean 10.6 ..
>> 
>>> No way to bootstrap from gcc ?  or from the old 32bit ghc (that one  
>>> at least
>>> did build correctly...)?
>> 
>> I'm sure it's possible (we did this throughout ghc 6), it's just a
>> larger maintenance burden than I'd like. I'll probably just keep ghc 7
>> as Distribution: 10.6 and roll back to ghc 6 in <= 10.5 for now.
> 
> ghc6 did have the same or similar problem under 64bit with 10.5.8
> _ though not under 32bit...
> 
> So, if no bootstrap through gcc, the only way would be to try first
> building ghc-7 under 32bit using ghc-6 there to bootstrap, then
> using that 32bit ghc7 to try bootstrapping a 64bit ghc7 ...
> Feasible ?
> 
> Jean-Francois
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously valuable.
> Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance, security 
> threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes 
> sense of it. IT sense. And common sense.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-c2
> _______________________________________________
> Fink-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> List archive:
> http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.macosx.fink.user
> Subscription management:
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously valuable.
Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance, security 
threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes 
sense of it. IT sense. And common sense.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-c2
_______________________________________________
Fink-users mailing list
[email protected]
List archive:
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.macosx.fink.user
Subscription management:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users

Reply via email to