Thanks, Alexander! I was expecting to have to learn about the packaging system, to have to fix it myself. This makes my problem go away.
One thought, though: the ARPACK headers have generic names (stat.h, version.h, and debug.h). Would it not be a better idea to move them into include/arpack, rather than just include, to avoid confusion with other packages? I can certainly live with these where they are, of course. On Sun, Apr 8, 2012 at 11:48 AM, Alexander Hansen <[email protected]> wrote: > On 4/7/12 9:36 PM, Luke Stras wrote: >> >> My apologies if this has been asked before. >> >> I'm porting over a package (from a Unix box) that uses ARPACK, and I >> was happy to discover that Fink includes this in the package list. >> However, near as I can tell, the packages (both arpack/arpack-shlibs, >> and arpack-atlas/arpack-atlas-shlibs) install only the libraries and >> documentation. I also need header files; is there any way I can get >> these installed? Or are they in a different package, that I'm not >> seeing? >> >> Thanks in advance for any help. >> >> > I just put out new revisions of arpack and arpack-ng that have all of the > headers from their source tarballs. You can get them via "fink > selfupdate". > > > -- > Alexander Hansen, Ph.D. > Fink User Liaison > http://finkakh.wordpress.com/2012/02/21/got-job/ > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ For Developers, A Lot Can Happen In A Second. Boundary is the first to Know...and Tell You. Monitor Your Applications in Ultra-Fine Resolution. Try it FREE! http://p.sf.net/sfu/Boundary-d2dvs2 _______________________________________________ Fink-users mailing list [email protected] List archive: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.macosx.fink.user Subscription management: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
