Jon,
Thanks. I'll update and see how it works. I've already
switched to Trunk, and won't use the anisotropy
branch anymore.
Andy
----------------------
Andrew Reeve
Dept. of Earth Science
University of Maine
Orono, ME 04469
On Fri, 8 Feb 2008, Jonathan Guyer wrote:
Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2008 15:09:33 -0500
From: Jonathan Guyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [email protected]
To: Multiple recipients of list <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: getDivergence in a mesh with heterogeneous cellVariable's
I've found the gradient sign error and committed the fix to trunk/,
branches/version-1_2, and branches/anisotropy[*]. Unfortunately, it doesn't
seem to do anything to reduce the magnitude of your divergences. I suspect
that may be a result of mesh non-orthogonality, rather than normal
misorientation. I'll run it by Daniel when he gets back next week(?).
On Feb 4, 2008, at 4:29 PM, asreeve wrote:
I think this is why my previous scripts involving a convection term where
not working (I was getting negative concentrations in some cases).
Yes, it seems to fix that problem (which sort of surprises me, because the
error in sign seemed to impact very, very little unless you explicitly asked
for a gradient).
[*] As Daniel said, you should switch over to trunk, as your anisotropic
diffusion is merged there now and then we can terminate anisotropy branch to
remove any confusion.
