I guess I spoke too soon. FWIW, I'm running Trilinos version: 11.10.2.
On Mar 29, 2016, at 3:34 PM, Guyer, Jonathan E. Dr. (Fed) <jonathan.gu...@nist.gov> wrote: > I'm not seeing a leak. The below is for trilinos. VSIZE grows to about 11 MiB > and saturates and RSS saturates at around 5 MiB. VSIZE is more relevant for > tracking leaks, as RSS is deeply tied to your system's swapping architecture > and what else is running; either way, neither seems to be leaking, but this > problem does use a lot of memory. > > What do I need to do to get it to run longer? > > > > On Mar 25, 2016, at 7:16 PM, Michael Waters <waters.mik...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> I still have a large memory leak when using Trilinos. I am not sure where to >> start looking so I made an example code that produces my problem in hopes >> that someone can help me. >> >> But! my example is cool. I implemented Density Functional Theory in FiPy! >> >> My code is slow, but runs in parallel and is simple (relative to most DFT >> codes). The example I have attached is just a lithium and hydrogen atom. The >> electrostatic boundary conditions are goofy but work well enough for >> demonstration purposes. If you set use_trilinos to True, the code will >> slowly use more memory. If not, it will try to use Pysparse. >> >> Thanks, >> -Michael Waters >> <input.xyz><fipy-dft.py>_______________________________________________ >> fipy mailing list >> fipy@nist.gov >> http://www.ctcms.nist.gov/fipy >> [ NIST internal ONLY: https://email.nist.gov/mailman/listinfo/fipy ] > > > <attachment.png> > _______________________________________________ > fipy mailing list > fipy@nist.gov > http://www.ctcms.nist.gov/fipy > [ NIST internal ONLY: https://email.nist.gov/mailman/listinfo/fipy ] _______________________________________________ fipy mailing list fipy@nist.gov http://www.ctcms.nist.gov/fipy [ NIST internal ONLY: https://email.nist.gov/mailman/listinfo/fipy ]
