See these for example, - https://www.ctcms.nist.gov/fipy/documentation/USAGE.html#applying-internal-boundary-conditions - https://stackoverflow.com/questions/33109744/fipy-interior-conducting-boundary-conditions - https://www.mail-archive.com/fipy@nist.gov/msg03674.html - https://gist.github.com/guyer/a61d5adfa9a050eb970a
On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 10:43 AM, Daniel Wheeler <daniel.wheel...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 3:39 PM, Zhekai Deng > <zhekaideng2...@u.northwestern.edu> wrote: >> Hi Daniel, >> >> Thanks for the reply. I have a quick question regarding to varying >> coefficients approach. I have two boundary conditions needed to apply, one >> on the free surface and other one below the free surface with certain depth. >> Thus, these are two the boundaries that I am trying to move as the tank gets >> depleted. These are two straight line moving at a constant speed as the tank >> depletes. Previously, because I solve the equation using fixed domain, I use >> gmsh to draw and mark the boundary. Does this prevent me from varying >> coefficient approach? > > No, not at all. The boundary conditions can be reformulated as sources > that only apply in the region of the interface. > > -- > Daniel Wheeler -- Daniel Wheeler _______________________________________________ fipy mailing list fipy@nist.gov http://www.ctcms.nist.gov/fipy [ NIST internal ONLY: https://email.nist.gov/mailman/listinfo/fipy ]
