{#}  Replies are directed back to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
{#}  To reply to the author, write to Brad Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

If anyone is looking for more info on jabber's ins & outs from a 
programming perspective, I happened upon this 
( http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0596002025/qid=1014878530/sr=8-1/
ref=sr_8_129_1/002-9614268-6496820 ) O'reilly book while shopping over 
the holidays. Slashdot & many others seem to favor this series highly &, 
from what I could tell, seems very extensive. I love the idea of 
jabber & what it could potentially mean for the future of text 
messaging, however there is currently, as Derek pointed out, no good 
client for OSX. JabberFOX ("Jabber-For-OSX", clever name & icon) seems 
to be making some headway, but leaves a lot to be desired in the 
features/user interface department, which as we all know are among 
Fire's strongest areas.

Brad

"Wont that be grand? The computers & the programs will start thinking & 
the people will stop."

On Wednesday, February 27, 2002, at 01:04  PM, Derek J. Balling wrote:

> {#}  Replies are directed back to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> {#}  To reply to the author, write to "Derek J. Balling" 
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>>> a.) Is there any way to set the Resource for the Jabber signon (e.g. 
>>> "Work", "Home", "Laptop")?
>> Nope.
>
> Interestingly, from looking at the code, I thought I could set my 
> server name to "jabberserver/resource", and from what I saw in 
> libEBjabber.c, it would "figure out" that it didn't need to set the 
> "/everybuddy" bit.
>
> Except that it made me sign in as "users@server/Work/everybuddy" 
> instead of just "user@server/Work".
>
>>> b.) If I get a message from "user@jabberserver/Home", I'm being told 
>>> that I'm replying to simply "user@jabberserver", which may (or may 
>>> not) get to the user (depending on their client-resource/priority 
>>> settings). Is this a known bug? Basically every time my boss sends me 
>>> a message I end up replying to his home machine, because it has the 
>>> higher priority value[1].
>>> Any thoughts on this?
>> The jabber client I did was pretty bare bones.  I am still not sold on 
>> the whole jabber scheme (especially their "resources") and as such 
>> never even thought about tackling it a year or more ago when I did it.
>> Jabber is by far the least used Fire service (with IRC bringing up a 
>> close 2nd) and as such it gets almost no attention.
>
> Any chance of you (or someone) taking a better look at the Jabber 
> stuff? I've got zero C-programming skill, but I can certainly provide 
> an ample test environment, and there's really no GOOD jabber client for 
> OSX, so Fire is the best thing Jabber users have going for them. (and 
> since my company is about to lock down AOL/Yahoo out of the office, and 
> settle on an internal Jabber server, I'm motivated to "make my Mac work 
> like the rest of them" because I don't want to get saddled with a 
> windows machine).
>
> D
>
>
> -- +---------------------+-----------------------------------------+
> | [EMAIL PROTECTED]  | "Thou art the ruins of the noblest man  |
> |  Derek J. Balling   |  That ever lived in the tide of times.  |
> |                     |  Woe to the hand that shed this costly  |
> |                     |  blood" - Julius Caesar Act 3, Scene 1  |
> +---------------------+-----------------------------------------+
>
> {#} ----------------------------------------------------+[ fire ]+---
>
>


{#} ----------------------------------------------------+[ fire ]+---


Reply via email to