I'd actually like to pursue this, if someone(s) want(s) to help me. Proteus makes the source to their Services controller available, so...
Like I said, it'd be difficult to implement, but thankfully difficult != impossible.
On Saturday, April 13, 2002, at 12:24 , Eric Peyton wrote:
{#} Replies are directed back to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
{#} To reply to the author, write to Eric Peyton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
This is very similar to the way that Proteus now works. If someone wants to go and steal back all the code that Proteus took from Fire and then turn their back end into our back end, fine, but neither Colter nor I have had the time to do so yet ...
(Fire is built in a modular way, but the bundles have become somewhat integral to the functioning of the app now ...)
Eric
On Friday, April 12, 2002, at 04:31 PM, David Remahl wrote:
{#} Replies are directed back to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
{#} To reply to the author, write to David Remahl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hey all,
I just had kind of a wacky idea while I was using screen. Screen is a
great program that enables me to leave an IRC client running, then ssh
from my work machine into my home machine and attach to it. My ability
to do the same on my Treo (with TGssh) led me to wish there were some
way to attach to a Fire session. That, in turn, led to a wacky idea:
Would it be possible to split Fire into two pieces, a "back end" that
ran and connected to the various services, and then an interchangeable
"front end", consisting of, for instance, Fire's current GUI, a Palm
interface, a console interface, etcetera? This would allow, for example,
someone to leave the back end running, and then connect into one's
sessions from a remote machine.
It'd obviously be difficult to implement from where Fire is now, but I
just thought it'd be interesting to ponder.
Charlie
The linux IRC client licq is designed in this modal way. Most everything is
a plugin. It is as you say very cool and powerful, and allows for great
customizability and removes bloat. However, as you say, it would be a pain
to implement as things currently are.
/ David
{#} ----------------------------------------------------+[ fire ]+---
{#} ----------------------------------------------------+[ fire ]+---
- Possible architectural change? Charlie Orme
- Re: Possible architectural change? David Remahl
- How to easily implement file transfer.. sorta Martin H�cker
- Re: How to easily implement file transfer.... Matthew Stuckwisch
- Re: How to easily implement file trans... Colter Reed
- Re: How to easily implement file transfer.... Eric Peyton
- Re: How to easily implement file trans... Martin H�cker
- Bug Report: Authorization doesn?t... Martin H�cker
- Re: Possible architectural change? Eric Peyton
- Charlie Orme
