Folks: Just a reminder that the focus of this list is the law
and policy of firearms regulation, discussed on a level helpful to
people doing academic research in the field. General questions of
police misconduct are not, it seems to me, squarely on-topic (though I
realize that they're indirectly connected).
Eugene
________________________________
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Autumn Rose
Press
Sent: Monday, March 26, 2007 11:44 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Ucla. Edu
Subject: FW: "To Serve and Protect"
________________________________
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joseph E.
Olson
Sent: Sunday, March 25, 2007 6:20 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Ucla. Edu
Subject: Re: "To Serve and Protect"
No. At my University sex with a student is a capital offense.
I know of three instances over my career (all very well hidden
BTW) in which the person was fired and off campus for good within three
hours of discovery. In another instance, the accused chose a faculty
board and prolonged the agony for a few weeks. The incidence of this
sort of thing is much less than it was in the '70's.
Is your university the measure by which all others operate?
Sexual Predation still occurs, does it not? How could anyone but
Academics know who is doing it? Do they not close ranks, like Doctors do
when one kills a patient, or when Bar Associations slap a crooked layer
on the wrist in an ethics complaint? The inference that all academics
tolerate it and are therefore complicit still stands, does it not?
It's is no different than your rant against the PO-LEECE. The
Chicago PD, famous for graft, corruption and brutality is not a good
yardstick by which to measure all 800,000 police officers in the USA.
Having grown up in Chicago, I have 1st person knowledge of that
department and their behavior on the street. You alleged things that you
could not and do not know about all police officers in the nation. That
is not accurate or fair, in my view. Your mention of IA officers being
exempt from your criticism indicates to me that you have little
knowledge of administrative and internal procedures as well as who is
selected to those positions.
Mind you, I'm not defending the Chicago PD or LE in general, but
the same broad brush you used is used to paint gun owners and 2A
organizations and defenders and I was surprised, no, blown away to see
it come from someone like you.
Joe Horn
>>> "Autumn Rose Press" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 03/25/07 7:41
PM >>>
Is that the same as i.e., A few academics let/cause/bully
students to trade sex for grades, and the academics that don't do that
but *do* know about the other few that do are just as perverted,
unethical and lo-life as the actual sexual predator academics? Just
thought I'd ask for clarification's sake..
_______________________________________________
To post, send message to Firearmsregprof@lists.ucla.edu
To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see
http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/firearmsregprof
Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as private.
Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are posted; people can
read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward the
messages to others.
