Phil: It was an attempt at sarcasm/irony/humor. The remark about the S.Ct. was not to be taken literally. If you still don't get it, read the article, the Barnett & Kates reply at 45 Emory L.J. 1139. If you still don't get it, contact Prof. Olson or any member of the Academics for the Second Amendment. (Just in case you miss it, the preceding sentence is another attempt at humor). Ray
-----Original Message----- From: Philip F. Lee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, July 13, 2008 4:19 PM To: Raymond Kessler; firearmsregprof@lists.ucla.edu Subject: Re: "Gun Crazy" It isn't clear to me whether this part of the comment "All I can say is that I wonder how the gun lobby was able to buy 5 members of the Supreme Court?" is a serious question or how it relates to Herz's article? If it is a seriously intended question, I believe the questioner has taken leave of his senses. Phil > This is a multipart message in MIME format. > > > I'm sure some of you are familiar with Andrew Herz's "Gun Crazy" Article at > 75 Boston U. Law. Rev. 57 (1995)-Some of you were probably attacked and > portrayed as "lackeys" of the "gun lobby." All I can say is that I wonder > how the gun lobby was able to buy 5 members of the Supreme Court? > > > -- The Art of war is simple enough. Find out where your enemy is. Get at him as soon as you can. Strike at him as hard as you can and as often as you can, and keep moving on. -- Ulysses S. Grant _______________________________________________ To post, send message to Firearmsregprof@lists.ucla.edu To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/firearmsregprof Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as private. Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are posted; people can read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward the messages to others.
