The coverage and meaning of the PLCA is a FEDERAL question. What is it doing in state court? On Feb 22, 2016 18:19, "Henry Schaffer" <h...@unity.ncsu.edu> wrote:
> > http://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2016/02/22/467688334/ar-15-gun-maker-seeks-to-dismiss-lawsuit-filed-by-sandy-hook-parents > > All I know is that I heard this item today - and the emphasis was on how > the *style* of the rifle indicated that Remington shouldn't have > manufactured it for sale into the civilian market and therefore that the > 2005 Protection of Lawful Commerce and Arms Act shouldn't apply. > > I read a number of the comments and again the style was frequently > mentioned. > > The above has links to a number of news sources, I didn't see any to court > documents. > > --henry schaffer > > _______________________________________________ > To post, send message to Firearmsregprof@lists.ucla.edu > To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see > http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/firearmsregprof > > Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as > private. Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are > posted; people can read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or > wrongly) forward the messages to others. >
_______________________________________________ To post, send message to Firearmsregprof@lists.ucla.edu To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/firearmsregprof Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as private. Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are posted; people can read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward the messages to others.
