Yes. That's the study I heard described in the broadcast. Thanks. --henry schaffer
On Tue, Jan 3, 2017 at 8:04 PM, Olson, Joseph E. <jol...@hamline.edu> wrote: > This one? http://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamainternalmedicine/ > fullarticle/2594804 > > Although they mention "gun violence" at lot, the basic premise is that > those who hang with bad guys are in danger because of that association > (nothing new). The focus is on people and how to divert those people from > using "violence" as a response to everything. > > ************************************************************ > ******************************************************** > Professor Joseph Olson, J.D.(*Honors,* Duke), Ll.M (Florida) > Office 651-695-7674| > Hamline University School of Law (Emeritus) > Fax: 651-290-6426 > Mitchell-Hamline School of Law (Emeritus & Adjunct) > C*ell 612-865-7956 <(612)%20865-7956>* > jol...@hamline.edu <jol...@hamliine.edu> [primary] *or* > joe.ol...@mitchellhamline.edu [secondary] > > On Tue, Jan 3, 2017 at 6:44 PM, Henry Schaffer <h...@ncsu.edu> wrote: > >> This on the air this evening on NPR's All Things Considered >> http://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2017/01/03/508037642/ >> study-says-gun-violence-should-be-treated-as-a-public-health-crisis >> >> It has a link which is supposed to go to the study in JAMA (Journal of >> the American Medical Assoc) but mistakenly links to a 30 year old study. >> >> NPR says, "David Stark, one of the study's leaders ..." - so I searched >> JAMA for his name, and found this just published article: >> ------------------ >> JAMAResearch LetterJanuary 3, 2017 >> Funding and Publication of Research on Gun Violence and Other Leading >> Causes of DeathDavid E. Stark, MD, MS; Nigam H. Shah, MBBS, PhD >> JAMA. 2017; 317(1):84-85. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.16215 >> >> This study uses Centers for Disease Control and Prevention mortality and >> federal agency research funding data to compare funding for and publication >> of gun violence research with that for 30 other leading causes of death in >> the United States. >> >> Abstract: >> The United States has the highest rate of gun-related deaths among >> industrialized countries, with more than 30 000 fatalities annually.1 To >> date, research on gun violence has been limited. A 1996 congressional >> appropriations bill stipulated that “none of the funds made available for >> injury prevention and control at the Centers for Disease Control and >> Prevention [CDC] may be used to advocate or promote gun control.”2 Similar >> restrictions were subsequently extended to other agencies (including the >> National Institutes of Health), and although the legislation does not ban >> gun-related research outright, it has been described as casting a pall over >> the research community.2,3 This study sought to determine whether funding >> and publication of gun violence research are disproportionately low >> relative to the mortality rate from this cause. >> --------------- >> >> which doesn't quite fit the story of what I heard on the air, (which had >> a lot about violence in social networks in Chicago- and there is no link >> the the recording of the on-air item. Maybe there will be tomorrow?) but >> it does have that Figure 1 shown on the web. >> >> --henry schaffer >> >> _______________________________________________ >> To post, send message to Firearmsregprof@lists.ucla.edu >> To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see >> http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/firearmsregprof >> >> Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as >> private. Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are >> posted; people can read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or >> wrongly) forward the messages to others. >> > >
_______________________________________________ To post, send message to Firearmsregprof@lists.ucla.edu To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/firearmsregprof Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as private. Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are posted; people can read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward the messages to others.
