On 11/30/11 14:39, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote:
> 30.11.2011 9:08, Thomas Steinmaurer wrote:
>> Or more "object type bound", e.g.:
>>
>> ALTER TABLE ... CHANGE OWNER TO ...
>> ALTER VIEW ... CHANGE OWNER TO ...
>>
>> etc..
>>
>> ALTER PROCEDURE ... DROP SOURCE;
>>
>>
>> I have no idea if the SQL standard suggests here something.
>    I agree with changing owner, but dropping the sources is a way to nowhere. 
> Firebird 
> requires sources to recompile invalid objects.
>

BLR remains.

Btw, I also do not like practice of dropping the sources. People use it
as a kind of protection for the database. This protection is not efficient.
But if users need that feature I can better agree with adding SQL
support than keeping an ability to modify system tables.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure 
contains a definitive record of customers, application performance, 
security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this 
data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-novd2d
Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at 
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel

Reply via email to