On 14/06/2012 09:23, Mark Rotteveel wrote: > On 14-6-2012 12:50, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote: >> On 14/06/2012 06:13, Alex Peshkoff wrote: >>> For me this looks like regression, sorry. >>> >> If you talking about specific subject about warning removal, I'd instead >> call it "let bad legacy and non-feature interfere with new design for no >> reason". > Are you saying warnings are useless, or just the way they are currently > implemented? > Current (and current means all Firebird history time) it was useless, decided to continue being as it, and never wished to be improved.
But as soon as I try to remove it, it's now the beloved and standard feature... Adriano ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel
