On 31-8-2013 13:38, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote: > 31.08.2013 13:29, Mark Rotteveel wrote: >> As most languages don't need those surrogate pairs for their >> codepoints/glyphs, it is easier to consider UTF-16 to be 2 byte. As far >> as I know this is how most UTF-16 implementations handle it. > > In this case UTF-16 has no difference from UCS2. >
Almost but as far as I know UCS-2 didn't have the concept of surrogate pairs. Mark -- Mark Rotteveel ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Learn the latest--Visual Studio 2012, SharePoint 2013, SQL 2012, more! Discover the easy way to master current and previous Microsoft technologies and advance your career. Get an incredible 1,500+ hours of step-by-step tutorial videos with LearnDevNow. Subscribe today and save! http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=58040911&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel
