Den 2014-01-08 09:32 skrev Dmitry Yemanov såhär:
> 08.01.2014 12:15, Kjell Rilbe wrote:
>
>> That said, I'd vote against "plan for/hint" if the plan clause in its
>> current use is or is soon going to be deprecated. So, what are the plans
>> for the plan clause?
> Explicit planning is still used by some customers, so it cannot be
> deprecated. But it's not going to be extended/improved to catch up the
> optimizer evolution.

Isn't that just about what deprecated means? Still available, but 
outdated, will not be maintained/developed further, and should be 
avoided in new code?

Anyway, in that case I would consider the plan claus "dead" and vote for 
some other keyword, e.g. optimize for...

Kjell

-- 
--------------------------------------
Kjell Rilbe
DataDIA AB
E-post: kj...@datadia.se
Telefon: 08-761 06 55
Mobil: 0733-44 24 64



------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rapidly troubleshoot problems before they affect your business. Most IT 
organizations don't have a clear picture of how application performance 
affects their revenue. With AppDynamics, you get 100% visibility into your 
Java,.NET, & PHP application. Start your 15-day FREE TRIAL of AppDynamics Pro!
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=84349831&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at 
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel

Reply via email to