On 11/08/14 12:53, Alex Peshkoff wrote: >> IBPP can >> > still act as a high-level C++ wrapper, FIBPlus/FireDAC/whatever would >> > act the same for Delphi, etc. They just need to be ported to the new >> > core API (whatever it will be). > I agree with this is POV 100%.
I've been following the debate on 'new interface' and to be honest I still don't understand where the problem is. Having used IBObjects on legacy projects, that has not been used for a long time as I am now reliant on PHP and Jaybird these days to pull results from Firebird. Neither of these need an internal interface weight down by C++ and I'm sure a lot of power users are in the same boat? C++ is a layer on top of the connection to the database and I'm sure if I need to revert to that I'd be looking to IBObjects again, but certainly windows will not be featuring in that which ever way I go. -- Lester Caine - G8HFL ----------------------------- Contact - http://lsces.co.uk/wiki/?page=contact L.S.Caine Electronic Services - http://lsces.co.uk EnquirySolve - http://enquirysolve.com/ Model Engineers Digital Workshop - http://medw.co.uk Rainbow Digital Media - http://rainbowdigitalmedia.co.uk ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel
