04.02.2015 15:37, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote: > > In the last commit I see that Dmitry Yemanov replaced "catch (...)" with > "catch (const > Exception& ex)". Does this handler cover all exception types that protected > code can throw?
AFAIK, all our exceptions derive from Firebird::Exception, so nothing else can be thrown. This is why I prefer an explicit catch block over a generic one. Dmitry ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Dive into the World of Parallel Programming. The Go Parallel Website, sponsored by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your hub for all things parallel software development, from weekly thought leadership blogs to news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and join the conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/ Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel
