> As Dmitry pointed out, there are other features (beyond the database file > storage) which require a file system in order to operate. In our case, we need only an abstraction for a database file. Maybe also for a log file. > Please explain what you are looking to do. Why you don't want a file system? We are researching transparent encryption for a database file. But such abstraction allows to solve various custom storage scenarios.
On 31 August 2015 at 19:58, Leyne, Sean <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> Is it possible to use embedded engine with a custom implementation of >> filesystem abstraction? > > Firebird already supports using "RAW storage devices" for database > storage/persistence. Is that what you are looking for? > > As Dmitry pointed out, there are other features (beyond the database file > storage) which require a file system in order to operate. > > Please explain what you are looking to do. Why you don't want a file system? > > > Sean > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel
