On 06/07/2016 08:25 PM, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote: > On 07/06/2016 13:42, Alex Peshkoff wrote: >> On 06/07/2016 07:11 PM, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote: >>> 07.06.2016 18:06, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote: >>>> How should we align this things as show table <name> ? >>>> >>>> 1) If we do more or less nothing >>> It would be my choice. >>> >>> >> Agreed >> > But I then don't know what to do in these cases... > > > Function name Dependency > ================= ========== > F1 > F2 F1 > F2345678901234567890123456789 F2 > > > Should we do like collations? > > F1, Dependency: > F2, Dependency: F1 > F2345678901234567890123456789, Dependency: F2
Both cases (even with F2 running to the right of long name) appear acceptable, but something like this: F1 F2, Dependency: F1 F2345678901234567890123456789, Dependency: F2 i.e. no ", Dependency:" when there are no dependencies at all looks a bit better. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ What NetFlow Analyzer can do for you? Monitors network bandwidth and traffic patterns at an interface-level. Reveals which users, apps, and protocols are consuming the most bandwidth. Provides multi-vendor support for NetFlow, J-Flow, sFlow and other flows. Make informed decisions using capacity planning reports. https://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/305295220;132659582;e Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel
