17.01.2017 8:03, Dmitry Yemanov wrote: > You miss my point. It's written into RDB$FORMATS/RDB$RELATIONS but not > committed because transaction is still active. So concurrent > transactions cannot see these changes, accordingly to your versioning > approach. But VIO_get_current() must see them. Do you suggest to use > "dirty read" in such cases?
Doesn't VIO module always use dirty read when getting data? -- WBR, SD. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel
