Em 05/03/2017 12:45, Dimitry Sibiryakov escreveu: > 05.03.2017 16:34, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote: >>> I don't know BLR, so I can't say what verb must be used for VARYING. >>> >> blr_varying ? > > Yes, it looks like a right thing. Unfortunately, currently GPRE doesn't > support this > verb at all. The only types that it can handle is blr_text for fixed length > data and > blr_cstring for null-terminated strings. > I'll try to implement support for varying string in GPRE, but it can take > time. In > meantime I'd suggest to change declaration of PLG$PASSWD domain back to > VARCHAR CHARACTER > SET OCTETS. >
Wasn't VARBINARY a syntatic sugar for VARCHAR CHARACTER SET OCTETS? It looks like if things works different (even in a non ideal condition), there is a bug in the new code. (I already reported TCS behaving different after this feature) Adriano ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel
