>> A schema is a form of documentation and for tooling (classes generation).
>> It's very welcome.
Of course it will be good to have it. I do not negate this. But i suppose it is
not required at start.
>>With attributes, example: name="name", and not <Name>name</Name>.
>>Nodes only for structures.
I do not know if this will be flexible. Think about future when more detailed
information will be presented.
e.g. something like Postgress present. I do not suppose that this will be good
to have such info in attributes. But maybe it will be ok?
<Node-Type>Sort</Node-Type>
<Parallel-Aware>false</Parallel-Aware>
<Startup-Cost>611720.33</Startup-Cost>
<Total-Cost>611741.43</Total-Cost>
<Plan-Rows>8437</Plan-Rows>
<Plan-Width>281</Plan-Width>
<Sort-Key>
<Item>w.insp_id</Item>
<Item>w.konto_id</Item>
<Item>w.wplata_data_wyciagu</Item>
<Item>w.wplata_nr_wyciagu</Item>
<Item>w.wplata_nr_pozycji</Item>
</Sort-Key>
Regards,
Karol Bieniaszewski
Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel
