On 13/08/13 10:24, Paul Vinkenoog wrote: > Are there any opinions on this? My own knowledge of git is zero. Mine is slightly better than zero. I quite like git and subversion, but they are completely different beasts. Git has the advantage that I can do work and commit stuff even though my internet connection is down. Everything happens locally and my local repository has a full history too.
When I next get the internet back up, I can push my committed changes back to the main repository. Or, depending on how it was set up, issue a pull request to the repository administrator(s). > Are the benefits worth the trouble? And what happens with our history > if we move to git? I don't know this. There are tools to migrate Subversion, for example, that I know of. I don';t know of a CVS one nor whether the history comes too. I think a V3 branch in the existing repository is probably the best idea. We can (I assume) copy the existing docs into the V3 and then edit them to be more V3 specific? Cheers, Norm. -- Norman Dunbar Dunbar IT Consultants Ltd Registered address: 27a Lidget Hill Pudsey West Yorkshire United Kingdom LS28 7LG Company Number: 05132767 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Get 100% visibility into Java/.NET code with AppDynamics Lite! It's a free troubleshooting tool designed for production. Get down to code-level detail for bottlenecks, with <2% overhead. Download for free and get started troubleshooting in minutes. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=48897031&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Firebird-docs mailing list Firebird-docs@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-docs
