anyway, you think synchronizing access would be the solution?
----- Original Message ----- From: "pablosantosluac" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "For users and developers of the Firebird .NET providers" <firebird-net-provider@lists.sourceforge.net> Sent: Monday, December 18, 2006 1:48 PM Subject: Re: [Firebird-net-provider] Firebird 2.0 Embedded on Linux > Ok, problem then is thread safety. This was exactly the problem I had on > Linux. > > Is there a way to solve it apart from synchronizing calls? I guess only > one > DB operation could be active at a time... > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Helen Borrie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "For users and developers of the Firebird .NET providers" > <firebird-net-provider@lists.sourceforge.net> > Sent: Monday, December 18, 2006 3:29 AM > Subject: Re: [Firebird-net-provider] Firebird 2.0 Embedded on Linux > > >> At 09:31 AM 18/12/2006, you wrote: >>>well, I actually never got it to run, it crashed due to threading >>>problems... and I don't even know about 2.0 >>> >>>Hello: >>> > Well, I regularly ask the same question but... is there any progress >>> > on >>> > Firebird/Mono Embedded on Linux? >>>And what the problems of the embedded suppoer on linux ?? >> >> There seems to be a high level of confusion about "embedded on >> Linux", so I'm sticking my oar in here. There is only one way to >> build an embedded app on Linux and that's by using Classic and the >> libfbembed.so client, i.e. Classic's original direct-connect >> mechanism. It *does* require the presence of the security database >> and authentication at login and it does not use a network method for >> the connection. libfbembed.so is NOT thread-safe. It presents the >> same API but, as to whether there is a Mono data access layer for >> Firebird that's equivalent to the Windows .net providers, Carlos >> could best comment. >> >> Embedded on Windows is a different thing altogether. For one thing, >> it uses the "Windows local" network emulator (IPServer) for the >> connection. For another, it is a single instance of >> *Superserver*. Of course, as you know, it bypasses the security >> database altogether and doesn't authenticate the user >> connection. And it uses Windows API function calls. >> >> Helen >> >> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT >> Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share >> your >> opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash >> http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV >> _______________________________________________ >> Firebird-net-provider mailing list >> Firebird-net-provider@lists.sourceforge.net >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-net-provider > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT > Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share > your > opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash > http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV > _______________________________________________ > Firebird-net-provider mailing list > Firebird-net-provider@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-net-provider ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Firebird-net-provider mailing list Firebird-net-provider@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-net-provider
