>> If you don't mind me adding my 2 cents in to the discussion, I think
>> including the '@' symbol should be used just for readability sakes.
When
>> I am writing dynamic SQl the '@' symbol is a context clue for a
>> parameter. Just seems like less room for confusion, but of course it
is
>> just a preference.
>
>But we're talking about the internal representation. Of non-'@'-sign
>params and '@'-sign params.
>
>Maybe the best is to leave this as is ('cause it's good, clean,
>deterministic, ...) and only work for some changes in DDEX, where this
>"hack" VS uses. I've sent to Carlos some tests for this and then we'll
>make some changes, I think ha add his 0.02$ too. ;)
Guess I should have read the thread more closely. This teaches me when
not to add my 2 cents :).
Thanks for not torching me,
Steven
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Firebird-net-provider mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-net-provider
