On 2011.08.13 5:42 PM, Jiri Cincura wrote: > Hi *, > > I'd like to open discussion about versions of .NET Framework we're > going to support in 3.0+ versions of .NET provider. > > 1. I'm strongly thinking about dropping support for .NET 2, because a) > it's old, b) the .NET 3.5 doesn't change CLR, just bunch of new stuff, > c) upgrade itself is free, d) it will save some resources on > maintenance. > > 2. For the Compact Framework version, I have no idea what to do with > it. Obviously the CF is dead on mainstream with Windows Phone, but > there's still a lot of devices with WinCE (hard to predict what MS > will do with this part of market). The current shift is to data feeds > etc., but who knows, maybe somebody has good reasons to have direct > calls. > > Any thoughts? > Hi Jiri
I would keep support for .NET 2. Is still used by many users. I don't know on Mono if all feature are ported but .NET 2 is fully supported. Best regards -- Mercea Paul ___________________________________________ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ FREE DOWNLOAD - uberSVN with Social Coding for Subversion. Subversion made easy with a complete admin console. Easy to use, easy to manage, easy to install, easy to extend. Get a Free download of the new open ALM Subversion platform now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/wandisco-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Firebird-net-provider mailing list Firebird-net-provider@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-net-provider
