On Sun, Jul 29, 2012 at 3:37 AM, Jay Barreto <c...@jaybarreto.net> wrote: > hi! i wanted to know if it would be a good idea to switch the current invoke > action which has a lot of over head to the tpl task object which handles > this better imho with out breaking the contact.
You can use http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd321543 . And I'll add it for future version. But currently it's even not possible to issue more commands etc., so it'll be always blocking, though on different thread. We would need to a) cleanup the "lock" mess in whole codebase, because a lot of locks is wrong and/or not needed and b) push the async all the way down to socket, to be really not blocking and using IO completion port and c) rework internals to handle more commands (handles) through one (same) connection and transaction(s) (possibly more) [1]. http://blog.cincura.net/231316-running-commands-on-firebird-in-background-and-canceling/ Contributions welcome. :) [1] And of course we have to find a way to keep you, at least a little, from screwing up the connection and transaction while the command is running (even if it's valid from protocol's POV) -- Jiri {x2} Cincura (x2develop.com founder) http://blog.cincura.net/ | http://www.ID3renamer.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ Firebird-net-provider mailing list Firebird-net-provider@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-net-provider
