Thanks for the info Juri.  I failed to mention that we're a 
cross-platform solution, with Linux being the main one, so I'm more 
concerned with compatibility on Mono than on Windows.  It will just 
require some test cycles we don't have right now.

However, that shouldn't really affect what you're doing much since we're 
also not considering updating the Firebird provider at this time either. 
  The version we have seems to be working just fine and when the time 
comes we'll plan a full component analysis, test cycle, and repackaging 
effort.  Even if circumstances force us into it sooner than we'd like.

Thanks again,
Danny


Danny Gorton II
Co-founder
Absolute Power and Control, LLC
www.absolutepowerandcontrol.com
517-499-9069 (mobile)

On 11/14/2013 05:34 AM, Jiri Cincura wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 8:34 PM, Danny Gorton
> <da...@absolutepowerandcontrol.com> wrote:
>> If 4.0 backward compatibility is
>> OK, then it would be OK
>
> It's probbaly not 100%, but in case you're not relying on some "weird"
> behavior you found, you should be OK. You can read:
> http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ee941656%28VS.100%29.aspx
> http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ee855831%28VS.100%29.aspx
>

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DreamFactory - Open Source REST & JSON Services for HTML5 & Native Apps
OAuth, Users, Roles, SQL, NoSQL, BLOB Storage and External API Access
Free app hosting. Or install the open source package on any LAMP server.
Sign up and see examples for AngularJS, jQuery, Sencha Touch and Native!
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=63469471&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Firebird-net-provider mailing list
Firebird-net-provider@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-net-provider

Reply via email to