> But, what could cause it not to recognize those fields properly? > Because when I look in the database's system tables, the > RDB$FIELD_TYPE and RDB$FIELD_LENGTH both have values in them, one > would be VARCHAR(132) and the others would be CHAR(1).
Don't know. If you can confirm it's really those fields, put it to tracker and I'll look at it. -- Mgr. Jiří Činčura https://www.tabsoverspaces.com/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ Firebird-net-provider mailing list Firebird-net-provider@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-net-provider
