--- In firebird-support@yahoogroups.com, "red_october2009" wrote: > > I came across this document: > > http://www.firebirdsql.org/file/documentation/papers_presentations/html/paper-fbent-impacting.html > > It seems to be talking about a much older version of FB than is available > now. Even back in the days of Win 2003 Server, I've built systems that had > probably 300 concurrent users without performance degradation. > > I intend to connect about 2000 concurrent users. Is the subject FB version > capable on say, 16GB ram, assuming I have a very simple and efficient table > structure, queries, plans, FKs and PKs? > > If FB cannot handle this number of concurrent connections, what DB should I > move to? MS SQL or Oracle? or something else? >
Firebird can handle more than 100000 concurent users here is an example with a production system http://www.firebirdnews.org/?p=6797 I started updating the paper , some values are increased from that time , machines can handle a lot more these days
