OK then I stand corrected. But I still prefer a services layer approach
From: firebird-support@yahoogroups.com [mailto:firebird-support@yahoogroups.com] Sent: 21 January 2015 03:09 PM To: 'Louis van Alphen' lo...@nucleo.co.za [firebird-support] Subject: Re: [firebird-support] Re: Optimising High Latency Database Connections LvAlnczfs> Personally I won’t connect directly over a high latency LvAlnczfs> connection. You risk inconsistent updates and corruption. You are wrong. You cannot corrupted database because you are using a connection over a high latency network. The same applies for inconsistent updates (that's why transaction control exists). Btw, FB 3 has a much better protocol performance in such networks, as seem in my published test results: http://www.firebirdnews.org/testing-the-firebird-3-protocol-enhancements/ []s Carlos Firebird Performance in Detail - http://videos.firebirddevelopersday.com www.firebirdnews.org - www.FireBase.com.br [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
