SOLVED - Changed code to use explicit transactions and the problem went 
away, so I guess implicit transactions was "keeping the transaction opened" 
for a few extra milliseconds... while the other "process / thread / or ODBC 
object" was trying to read the data added by the last transaction, and as it 
was not commited yet, the data was not visible. Many many years ago, like 15 
years ago, a friend who advised me to use Firebird told me "dont use 
explicit transations with Firebird; you'll be better of leaving Firebird 
manage it implicit..."; it did not sound correct then.... and it came back 
to bite me now...

Cheers,
Fabian



        • R... tiberiu_horv...@yahoo.com [firebird-support]
        • R... Dalton Calford dcalf...@distributel.ca [firebird-support]
        • R... tiberiu_horv...@yahoo.com [firebird-support]
        • R... Dimitry Sibiryakov s...@ibphoenix.com [firebird-support]
        • R... tiberiu_horv...@yahoo.com [firebird-support]
        • R... Helen Borrie hele...@iinet.net.au [firebird-support]
        • R... tiberiu_horv...@yahoo.com [firebird-support]
        • R... Ann Harrison aharri...@ibphoenix.com [firebird-support]
        • [... fabia...@itbizolutions.com.au [firebird-support]
        • R... Tim Ward t...@telensa.com [firebird-support]
        • R... fabia...@itbizolutions.com.au [firebird-support]
        • R... Lester Caine les...@lsces.co.uk [firebird-support]
        • R... 'Leyne, Sean' s...@broadviewsoftware.com [firebird-support]
        • R... 'Leyne, Sean' s...@broadviewsoftware.com [firebird-support]
        • R... tiberiu_horv...@yahoo.com [firebird-support]
        • R... 'Leyne, Sean' s...@broadviewsoftware.com [firebird-support]
        • R... tiberiu_horv...@yahoo.com [firebird-support]
        • R... 'Leyne, Sean' s...@broadviewsoftware.com [firebird-support]
  • Re: [firebird-... tiberiu_horv...@yahoo.com [firebird-support]

Reply via email to