> On Mar 8, 2017, at 7:17 AM, Aldo Caruso aldo.car...@argencasas.com 
> [firebird-support] <firebird-support@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> Thanks for your answer.
> 
> Regarding the "blob not found" error, there is a thread about this issue [1]
> 
> Nevertheless, I believe that RO/RC transactions are assigned a unique ID, 
> because as I start them the next transaction ID keeps incrementing.
> 

Right. They're precommitted but do get unique ids.  I'm getting old  

Cheers,

Ann
> [1] 
> https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/firebird-support/conversations/topics/111668
> 
> Aldo Caruso
> 
>> El 07/03/17 a las 15:52, Ann Harrison aharri...@ibphoenix.com 
>> [firebird-support] escribió:
>> > On Mar 7, 2017, at 10:30 AM, Aldo Caruso               
>> > aldo.car...@argencasas.com wrote:
>> 
>> > 
>> > Supposing a connection only needs to read from a database. Which are the 
>> > benefits of starting a read only transaction ?
>> > 
>> I doubt that there is any difference in performance that you could measure. 
>> Almost all transactions change the database - cooperative garbage 
>> collection, incrementing the next transaction id on the header page, ending 
>> the transaction on the TIP. The security checks have to be made to insure 
>> read access - checking for higher levels is no more expensive. DEclaring a 
>> transaction to be read-only is a slight check on programmers - Firebird will 
>> detect and block writes that were added carelessly in a point version of an 
>> application.
>> 
>> However, a read-only, read-committed transaction has merit if you don't need 
>> consistency. Firebird doesn't assign a unique transaction id to RO/RC 
>> transactions, so they don't change the next transaction id, they don't block 
>> garbage collection, and they don't change the state of a bit on a TIP. From 
>> time to time (IIRC) they'll return a "blob. not found" error if the record 
>> holding the blob is garbage collected between the time the RO/RC transaction 
>> reads the record and retrieves the blob. 
>> 
>> Basically, read-only was implemented decades ago to give InterBase a check 
>> mark on standard compliance and Firebird added a hack to provide low 
>> overhead, low consistency transactions. 
>> 
>> Good luck,
>> 
>> Ann
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
  • [firebird-supp... Aldo Caruso aldo.car...@argencasas.com [firebird-support]
    • Re: [fire... Hugo Eyng hugoe...@msn.com [firebird-support]
    • Re: [fire... 'Carlos H. Cantu' lis...@warmboot.com.br [firebird-support]
    • Re: [fire... Ann Harrison aharri...@ibphoenix.com [firebird-support]
      • Re: [... Aldo Caruso aldo.car...@argencasas.com [firebird-support]
        • R... Ann Harrison aharri...@ibphoenix.com [firebird-support]

Reply via email to