test On Jul 10, 11:15 am, RichB <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks, > > I tried to develop a simplified test case, and it did break within the > script block without problem. I can't really submit my code at the > moment, but I'll keep an eye on things and submit when I have some > code that I can submit. > > Richard > > On Jul 10, 3:44 pm, johnjbarton <[email protected]> wrote: > > > If we had a test case we could fix > > it.http://code.google.com/p/fbug/issues/list > > jjb > > > On Jul 10, 1:55 am, RichB <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > sorry yes 1.4b7. I've actually externalised the javascript now, and it > > > breaks without problem, though seems to require it to be already > > > broken, or not started for a new breakpoint to be recognised. If the > > > js is within the html I cannot get it to break atall. > > > > Thanks, Richard > > > > On Jul 10, 6:36 am, johnjbarton <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Which version of Firebug? 1.4b7 is the version we are working on. > > > > jjb > > > > > On Jul 9, 8:08 am, RichB <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > I have written an html page and have javascript within the <head> > > > > > however if I place a breakpoint within this javascript the breakpoint > > > > > is never triggered despite an alert immediately after being shown. > > > > > Should I expect it to be triggered, or is it only triggered within > > > > > external files? Do I need to change a setting if not?
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Firebug" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/firebug?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
