Bob Hassinger wrote:
> If we can relate "Firebug" to "firefly", then note a firefly blinks  
> only when it is active and stays dark when it is inactive.   How about  
> an icon that reflects that analogy?
>   
that is a great idea, i think having firebug blink like every so many 
seconds would be kewl, pretty easy to do too as far as gfx are 
concerned. To me this seems very clever, which reflects how clever the 
tool is in addition.
> Watching all this dialog go back and forth about the UI I keep  
> thinking a significant part of the problem for me is that the UI is  
> not documented (and it keeps changing without documentation of the  
> changes).  At least there is no documentation to speak of that is  
> readily at hand when it is in use.  The result is that the user learns  
> the interface by discovery and implication, and discovers changes by  
> the same process.  Between analogs that do not match individual  
> understandings, changes from one release to another, and bugs that  
> lead to incorrect mental models of what is going on the tool becomes  
> difficult to use and evokes the flood of objections.
>   
i cant count how many questions or posts ive read about bugs whihc are 
just users not knowing how to use the interface in general or a changed 
and revised UI (IE the new fb beta version)
> I think understanding what is going on in those terms might help  
> everyone get closer to a common view of what is going on and what is  
> needed.  There are a pretty complicated set of concepts going on in  
> Firebug as to states and so on.  People need to at least know what is  
> intended so they can adapt their mental models and they can  
> differentiate between misunderstandings and bugs.
>   
i think in a way thats what all of these discussions are evolving into.
> Firebug needs to be easily discoverable and that means it has to draw  
> on established interface paradigms.  People bring established  
> understandings of what various interface elements do in an app or  
> tool, and what states to expect in an app.   Having different states  
> that are not obvious, and different effects for common UI elements has  
> to be avoided, or at a minimum well documented.
>   
personally speaking i haven't really noticed any majoy UI revisions or 
changes, other then the activation model and minor polishing, it took me 
about 2 mins to get used to the new version. I think putting together a 
doc guide and using that as a design and implementat`ion litmus would be 
excellant and prolly clear up atleats half of these invalid discussion 
posts.
> Less seriously:  Firebug needs a couple of things that would relieve  
> the maintainers of a large part of the messages and questions and give  
> them lots more time to actually develop.  The new user must sign a  
> release acknowledging that Firebug can not change the code on a host  
> site before they can use the tool.  Second, Firebug needs a big button  
> that "installs in a new profile".  It would be good if it would be  
> automatically invoked when the user runs into a problem too...  ;-)
>   
i agree with you on that one, i think its important to dumb the tool 
down during the install, meaning directly tell users that this t ool can 
not and will not change code on servers, that is a major pitfall to new 
web app dev's. Knowing is half the battle. =)
> Bob
>
>
> On Jul 15, 2009, at 12:28 PM, johnjbarton wrote:
>
>   
>>
>> On Jul 15, 9:13 am, Kara Rawson <[email protected]> wrote:
>> ...
>>     
>>> since we are on the topic of icons, how much work would it be to have
>>> the firebug activation icon in your browser switch to a firefly on  
>>> its
>>> back when its off rather then just have it grey, you know like what  
>>> bugs
>>> look like when they are dead. This would be cute, and funny. just a
>>> random idea.
>>>       
>> A practical reason to use icon orientation rather than just color is
>> that some users cannot detect the color difference easily due to
>> differences in eyesight.
>> jjb
>>
>>
>>     
>
> >
>
>   
ive also attacked two firebug logos for the dead bug, tell me what you 
think.

k

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Firebug" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/firebug?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

<<inline: fbdead_logo_1.jpg>>

<<inline: fb_dead_logo1_transparent.png>>

Reply via email to