On Aug 9, 7:32 am, Rowno <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, I've recently started learning Firebug extension development to > make a new extension. From what I understand is that since Firebug 1.8 > there's now two methods to develop an extension which are the standard > XUL method and the new AMD method. I've read in various places that in > Firebug 1.8 the AMD isn't quite ready to move existing extensions to > yet. What I'm wondering is that since I'm starting a new extension > from scratch, would be better for me to use the AMD method and save > refactoring later, or stick to the old XUL method? In order to properly design AMD style APIs we need feedback from Firebug extension developers so, you are welcome to start using AMD and report any problem you have with it!
There is already on report related to AMD based extensions http://code.google.com/p/fbug/issues/detail?id=4718 I have also created HelloAMD example that shows how to use AMD in extensions http://code.google.com/p/fbug/source/browse/#svn%2Fexamples%2Ffirebug1.9%2FHelloAMD You can use it as a skeleton and base your extension on it (only replace <ext-id> tokens). There is a lot of comments and some links to other resources. Please let me know if you see any problem. Honza -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Firebug" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/firebug?hl=en.
