Hi Sebastian
thanks very much for your discussion. Actually, what I got is not a
single 0 value for nsISocketTransport.STATUS_CONNECTING_TO, but sometimes
abnormal small interval values between nsISocketTransport.STATUS_*
CONNECTED_TO* and nsISocketTransport.STATUS_*CONNECTING_TO*. Therefore, I
am very curious about that.
I did check with both *firebug(version 1.9)* and wireshark, and they
are kept in lines with each other quite well.
btw, according to this
discussion<http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.mozilla.firefox.firebug/19314>,
the DNS period in later version of firebug is still time interval between
nsIHttpActivityObserver.ACTIVITY_SUBTYPE_REQUEST_HEADER and
nsISocketTransport.STATUS_CONNECTING_TO ?
thanks a lot
cui
2011/12/5 Sebo <sebastianzart...@gmx.de>
> However, what I did to test my script is that, each time I browse the
>> google page, the browser is started with an *empty* cache, and meanwhile
>> I used firebug(or other trace capture) as a test benchmark. And my problem
>> like that can be quite often happens.
>>
> So you get 0 for nsISocketTransport.STATUS_CONNECTING_TO even when the
> cache is empty and the page is requested from the server?
> Did you check with an external tool like Wireshark?
>
> Maybe Honza can tell you more.
>
>
> Sebastian
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "Firebug" group.
> To post to this group, send email to firebug@googlegroups.com
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> firebug+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at
> https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/firebug
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Firebug" group.
To post to this group, send email to firebug@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
firebug+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/firebug
