>
> I had both the net panel and script panel enabled. I didn't disable it in 
> the firefox add-ons page but I didn't actively used it on those pages, 
> either. That in combination with your answer sounds like Firebug wasn't 
> responsible for the hit counts, right?

Most probably yes.
Though I guess it's unclear what is meant by 'disabled'. With having 
Firebug disabled for a page I mean the Firebug icon (aka Firebug Start 
Button <https://getfirebug.com/wiki/index.php/Start_Button>) is gray, *not* 
that the whole extension is disabled.

I have the DownThemAll plugin and its Anticontainer exntension installed, 
> do you by any chance know if they could be responsible for the 17,000 hit 
> counts in this case?
>
I don't know their code, sorry. But just follow my other suggestions, i.e. 
create a new Firefox profile/disable all extensions. Doing you can easily 
see whether it's related to any extension.

Sebastian

On Thursday, December 11, 2014 12:59:48 AM UTC+1, Chris wrote:
>
> Thanks a lot for the answer, Sebastian.
>
> Unfortunately, the server is not my own, so testing like that is 
> impossible for me (on that server, anyway). The files (images) were 
> allocated on several pages within on domain on that server. I had both the 
> net panel and script panel enabled. I didn't disable it in the firefox 
> add-ons page but I didn't actively used it on those pages, either. That in 
> combination with your answer sounds like Firebug wasn't responsible for the 
> hit counts, right?
> I have the DownThemAll plugin and its Anticontainer exntension installed, 
> do you by any chance know if they could be responsible for the 17,000 hit 
> counts in this case?
>
>
> Am Mittwoch, 10. Dezember 2014 23:05:10 UTC+1 schrieb Sebastian Zartner:
>>
>> There is a single case, in which Firebug creates additional network 
>> requests. This is to load the sources for a JavaScript file in case the 
>> browser cache and the *Net* panel 
>> <https://getfirebug.com/wiki/index.php/Net_Panel> are disabled while the 
>> *Script* panel <https://getfirebug.com/wiki/index.php/Script_Panel> is 
>> enabled. See issue 7585 
>> <https://code.google.com/p/fbug/issues/detail?id=7585>.
>>
>> Otherwise Firebug does not create network requests. And if it's disabled 
>> for a page it even doesn't use any ressources.
>>
>> If I understand you well, you have a single page that consists of 2,000 
>> files? If so, you should definitely try to reduce the number of requests.
>>
>> Anyway, as a shot in the dark I'd say your requests may be caused by 
>> redirects. I suggest you try out your steps using a new Firefox profile 
>> <https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/profile-manager-create-and-remove-firefox-profiles>.
>>  
>> If you still get this huge amount of requests, it's related to the page or 
>> the server*. If you get the expected number of requests, go back to your 
>> normal profile, disable all extensions and check again whether you see the 
>> correct amount of requests. If so, enable the extensions one by one and try 
>> it again after enabling each extension.
>>
>> * I remember a case, in which a bug in a specific version of a ColdFusion 
>> server executed a script twice for a single request. (Though that's 
>> definitely an exceptional case.)
>>
>> Sebastian
>>
>> On Wednesday, December 10, 2014 8:52:57 PM UTC+1, [email protected] 
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi, 
>>>
>>> I have question that I couldn't answer via Google research so far:
>>> if I access a webpage, e.g. with images, banners, thumbnails etc, does 
>>> Firebug hit every single element of that webpage to analyze it even if I 
>>> don't use it explicitly on that page but only have the plugin installed to 
>>> firefox, resulting in enormous numbers of hit counts as if you'd be using a 
>>> download plugin or script?
>>> In my case I had downloaded a little above 2000 files which ended up in 
>>> over 17,000 hit counts registered by the server. And now I'm trying to find 
>>> the source for that because I didn't use any download script or similar (I 
>>> have DownThemAll installed but didn't use it here, though).
>>> Any help/advice would be appreciated.
>>>
>>> Best regards.
>>>
>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Firebug" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/firebug.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/firebug/4743891f-8a86-4fc2-b4cd-54db9627d660%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to