Firefox unfortunately doesn't expose this information yet, so Firebug can't 
display it. Though there's already bug 563623 
<https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=563623> asking to add an API 
for the request's origin.

Sebastian

On Tuesday, September 1, 2015 at 3:05:36 AM UTC+2, San wrote:
>
> I just spent many hours tracking down an error -- I finally solved it but 
> I'm wondering if there was a more efficient approach.
>
> It started when Firebug's Net panel alerted a missing GiF on the dev 
> server. The link in the Net panel pointed to the HTML file, but a quick 
> search revealed there was no image by that name being requested. Then I 
> methodically went through all the JS and CSS files linked into that HTML 
> page, and finally I searched the whole site, and there was no image by that 
> name in any of the code.
>
> Then I looked in the site's graphics folder, and I saw that a lot of the 
> image filenames were somewhat similar, occuring in semi-irregular series or 
> patterns (like FormDev_01_up.gif, FormDev_02_over.gif, etc.). Most of those 
> filenames didn't exist anywhere in the code, yet the images were loading, 
> so I finally realized that many of the filenames in the requests were being 
> generated _dynamically_ by the JS. That's why I couldn't find the missing 
> filename by searching all the code.
>
> Eventually I discovered, inside one of the linked JS files, that a loop 
> inside a function was using multiple regular expressions to generate and 
> then concatenate parts of the filenames, and there was a problem in one of 
> the regexps, so it was requesting a nonexistent gif. When I finally 
> deciphered the regexp and added just a couple of characters, the problem 
> went away. But it took forever because I had to figure it all out manually 
> -- even after I realized that the filenames were being generated 
> dynamically, I still had no idea which function or loop or regexp I should 
> be looking at. (There was a lot of JS.)
>
> Was there some more efficient way to do this, rather than just poking 
> around for hours as I did? I didn't use Firebug's debugger because I 
> wouldn't have even known where to put the breakpoint, or even which JS file 
> was the culprit. This all started with that error in Firebug's Net panel, 
> which I don't know very well -- is there some way to have it tell you more 
> precisely where the request is actually coming from, not just what HTML 
> file is supposedly requesting it?
>
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Firebug" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/firebug.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/firebug/ba096361-2f48-4e69-9862-ff0a6d2c3732%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to