Too much mud. Contradictory, unclear.
A social policy is or can be "please use please and thank you when asking
for something"
A personnel policy is to not "forward" email outside the company, sending is
okay, but don't forward.
Responding to an article like this with email that has keywords and you want
to read this because it has those words?
Don't let the employee's know and get a very good lawyer.
Good Luck
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Frederick M Avolio [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, January 15, 1999 8:51 AM
> To: Evan Brastow
> Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: RE: Content filtering
>
> This is clearer, and you are right. And let me be clearer before this
> subject goes away (which it would have if it was moderated, and I am
> guilty
> of keeping this alive as much asn anyone ;-)).
>
> The notion that "you can't (or shouldn't) enforce social or personnel
> policies with security devices" is wrong (as wrong as "you can't legislate
> morality"). But it is equally wrong, as Evan points out here, to CREATE
> personnel policies through implementing security mechanisms.
>
> THe mechanism should always enforce an existing policy (in a perfect
> world,
> but then we'd not need security policies or mechanisms in a perfect
> world).
>
> Fred
>
>
> Avolio Consulting
> 16228 Frederick Road, PO Box 609, Lisbon, MD 21765
> 410-309-6910 (voice) 410-309-6911 (fax)
> http://www.avolio.com
>
> -
> [To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
> "unsubscribe firewalls" in the body of the message.]
-
[To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
"unsubscribe firewalls" in the body of the message.]