[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > Historians claim that David Lang wrote: >> SSL not much you can do other then to allow it. This is packet >> filtering >> stuff. > Not really, Netscape, amoungst others makes a http(s) proxy that works > in t"reverse mode".. It could act as the real webserver, that way no > machines not under your control have access to the webserver (watch > that double negative). > This would allow for atleast some screening of the application data, > as well as you can use a OS with a known/good/robust TCP stack to > protect against pathological TCP streams. > You also get several optinos on where to install SSL certificates > depending on your needs. Sure enough. I'm using Stronghold to do this. Part of the application runs on IIS, so I had to do something to protect it... - [To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe firewalls" in the body of the message.]
- High performance/scalable firewalls peace
- Re: High performance/scalable firewalls Bennett Todd
- Re: High performance/scalable firewalls Daemeon Reiydelle
- Re: High performance/scalable firewa... Bennett Todd
- Re: High performance/scalable fi... Daemeon Reiydelle
- Re: High performance/scalab... Bennett Todd
- Re: High performance/scalab... Paul D. Robertson
- Re: High performance/scalable firewalls Christopher J. Witter
- Re: High performance/scalable firewalls David Lang
- Re: High performance/scalable firewalls Chad Schieken
- Re: High performance/scalable firewa... Chip Christian
- Re: High performance/scalable firewalls Daemeon Reiydelle
- RE: High performance/scalable firewalls Mike Batchelor
- Re: High performance/scalable firewalls Paul D. Robertson
- RE: High performance/scalable firewalls Rao, Prashanth
- RE: High performance/scalable firewalls Colin Campbell
- RE: High performance/scalable firewalls Mills, Gary
- Fwd: High performance/scalable firewalls Charles Manick Livermore
