On Wed, 26 May 1999, Larry Claman wrote:

> I agree, but that wasn't the intended point of my message.  I was trying to
> point out that when the firewall vendors say "we support whiz-bang protocol
> XYZ", for the most part what they've done is just preconfigure a plug-through
> proxy, which is no better than a packet filter.

A  plug-through proxy _is_ better than a packet filter because the end 
system "sees" a clean TCP stream written by the proxy. This reduces the 
risk of low level attacks.  

Rudi

-
[To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
"unsubscribe firewalls" in the body of the message.]

Reply via email to