The laws of some countries do not consider licit what is called in such
coutries a "leonine agreement" - an
agreement in which one of the parts has no option otherwise accept
whatsoever is stated (head I win ,tail you
loose).
I am not a lawer (may be one is in this list and would like help us) but may
be this is a breach in the usual
license agreement we well know , at least on those countries ,If a company
had looses and start a civil action
despite the "license agreement" it "signed" to.
Who knows ?
Best Regards.
PL Steinbruch
PS. I never understood how this "license agreements" could last so long...
----- Original Message -----
From: Gerardo Soto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: P L STEINBRUCH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: Bill Stackpole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; 'Frederick M Avolio'
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, May 30, 1999 8:22 PM
Subject: Re: DCOM on Gauntlet
> >
> > >... I would like to suggest, even further, that we refuse
> > > to accept license agreements that eliminate the manufacture's
liability if
> > > their products do not perform as advertised and in so doing put our
> > > companies at risk.
> That is one of biggest utopias of this bussiness
> But I am 100% with you. What do you suggest we can do ?
>
>
> -
> [To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
> "unsubscribe firewalls" in the body of the message.]
-
[To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
"unsubscribe firewalls" in the body of the message.]
