> -----Urspr�ngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Brian Steele [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Gesendet am: Mittwoch, 2. Juni 1999 14:05
> An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Betreff: RE: Why not NT?
>
> What's so funny about this whole thread is these guys ranting and raving
> about NT being not suitable for Firewall work, but many companies are
> happily, and successfully, employing NT Firewalls anyway.
>
[Kunz, Peter] Not "not suitable", but "probably not you rbest
option". Perhaps they're emplyoing, but not implementing a NT Firewall.
> Perhaps what they should really be asking is what do those companies know
> about employing an NT-based system that they don't.
>
[Kunz, Peter] Rather, what don't those companies not yet know that
"they" already do.
I Think Paul's and Dana's mail sum it up nicely.
cu
-pete
-
[To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
"unsubscribe firewalls" in the body of the message.]
