CheckPoint's FireWall-1 is sold to run on the following platforms:
HP-UX 10.x
AIX 4.2.1 and 4.3.0
Solaris 2.5 and higher
Windows NT Server 4.x Service Pack 3.01 (Intel-based only)
It has been my experience that the majority are installed on Solaris and NT
boxes.
My question for this discussion is this: why would CheckPoint take
FireWall-1 to NT? It seems that they are the commercial software firewall
leaders in the marketplace. Why would they risk jeopardizing their product
and their reputation by selling a product to be built on top of an OS that
isn't (or can't be made to be) secure?
This reasoning does not lead me to believe that the NT OS is an inherently
secure one, but it does lead me to believe even more strongly that the NT OS
*can* be made secure and that the real important factor is the installation
and administration ... a point that has been made several times through the
course of this discussion.
--gill
=====================================
James Gill * http://www.topsecret.net
=====================================
-
[To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
"unsubscribe firewalls" in the body of the message.]
