The specs on the 440 specify it could handle 2 loaded DS-3's (I am told
96Mb's without NAT or encryption, but I will find that out in the lab this
week I hope).

The 650 propoganda says it's rated at 128Mbs.  Wow, eh?  I get to play
with those too in the near future.  Can't wait to see the real numbers.

Carric Dooley
COM2:Interactive Media
http://www.com2usa.com

On Wed, 2 Jun 1999, Ben Keepper wrote:

> The Nokia 410 is disco'd.
> The 440 configured for a T1 and a 50user firewall and the redundant hardrive
> goes for about $20K including the pricey maintenance.
> 
> The 440 will  easily handle one or two T1s and based upon Nokia performance
> figures should handle a T3.
> 
> Both now do fail over out of the box and there are several load balancing
> options including built in routing.
> 
> As routers, they are up there with Cisco 7200 series in performance (which
> make both models very attractive on a price point).
> 
> If you are securing a T3 with a lot of concurrent VPNs go for the 650.
> Also, with the additional redundant power supply in the 650, its the box to
> go with for supreme reliability.
> 
> Ben
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Gary Ramah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Wednesday, June 02, 1999 12:34 PM
> Subject: Nokia IP Series
> 
> 
> > I would like to hear user comments from anybody using the following
> > products:
> >
> > Nokia IP400 Series
> > Nokia IP650 Series
> > Nokia's IPSO routing operating system
> > with Check Point's FireWall-1
> >
> > My specific questions:
> >
> > 400 vs. 650 performance & availability
> > Price of the fully configured system
> >
> > Opinions on these products.
> >
> > Thanks in advance.
> >
> > --
> > Gary Ramah
> > Advanced Network Technology and Applications
> > NASA Ames Research Center
> > Mail Stop 233-21
> > Moffett Field, CA 94035-1000
> > USA
> >
> > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > http://www.nren.nasa.gov
> >
> > 650-604-0890 (voice)
> > 650-604-3080(fax)
> > -
> > [To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
> > "unsubscribe firewalls" in the body of the message.]
> 
> -
> [To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
> "unsubscribe firewalls" in the body of the message.]
> 

-
[To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
"unsubscribe firewalls" in the body of the message.]

Reply via email to