> If the firewall *only* allows the GET command through, there shouldn't be > anything to worry about. Right? (1) I see no reason to assume a buffer overflow can't be hidden in a GET. (2) How many websites don't include forms these days? - [To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe firewalls" in the body of the message.]
- Re: Why not NT? Anonymous
- Re: Why not NT? Anonymous
- Re: Why not NT? Anonymous
- Re: Why not NT? Anonymous
- Re: Why not NT? Anonymous
- RE: Why not NT? Anonymous
- Re: Why not NT? Anonymous
- Re: Why not NT? Anonymous
- Re: Why not NT? Anonymous
- Re: Why not NT? Anonymous
- Re: Why not NT? Anonymous
- Re: Why not NT? Anonymous
- Re: Why not NT? Anonymous
- Re: Why not NT? Anonymous
- Re: Why not NT? Anonymous
- Re: Why not NT? Anonymous
- Re: Why not NT? Anonymous
- Re: Why not NT? Anonymous
- Re: Why not NT? Anonymous
- Re: Why not NT? Anonymous
- Re: Why not NT? Anonymous
