right on spiffster, or is is spliff? ;)
i've never seen this thing moderated - this is one the few strings
i've followed and it is of value to me...
thanks to all who have contributed and if ken really wants a job and
wants to move to arizona - give me a shout.
-mike
On Fri, 2 Jul 1999, spiff wrote:
>
>
>
> On Fri, 2 Jul 1999, Lamb Donald wrote:
>
> > I must be confused here. Isn't this supposed to be a technical forum?
>
> I wasn't aware this was a "technical" listserv, just that it is a
> "firewalls" listserv. We had better alert the moderator to ALL discussion
> of "Non-Technical" issues, and get an a decree to cease and desist for
> those who would speak "non-technical".
>
> I think the loss of packetstorm, while not "Technical", is a relevant
> issue, considering it was one of the bleeding edge security collections.
>
> Technically speaking, packetstorm had all the Technical stuff one could
> want on the server, which technically speaking, is gone.
>
> It appears that the data that was on packetstorm will find its way back
> online, some of it already has. Ain't technology grand?
>
> -
> [To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
> "unsubscribe firewalls" in the body of the message.]
>
-
[To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
"unsubscribe firewalls" in the body of the message.]
