I also found it creates major network traffic. Big bandwidth hog.
But thanks you for the pointer. At least I can look at The apps behavior and
know where to look.
-D-
-----Original Message-----
From: Security [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, August 30, 1999 9:52 AM
To: Alexander Woodby
Cc: David Watson; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Port scanning Detection
It is definitely a dog. It pegged my cpu at 100% with only one address to
check. It is definitely not a recommendation, only a
product that I am aware of. The hope is that the CPU problems will get
resolved
in the released version.
Jim Lemieux
Alexander Woodby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 08/27/99 05:36:30 PM
To: Security/CT/ERNotes@ER
cc: David Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Port scanning Detection
Has anyone else tried this antisniff? It ran like a total dog on the
system when I tried it. Not a complaint really, it's the only tool of
it's type, just a note.
--alex
Security wrote:
>
> Try L0pht's Antisniff. It is still in beta, but it is the only product I
am
> aware of on NT.
>
> Good Luck!
>
> Jim Lemieux
>
> David Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 08/26/99 03:59:30 PM
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> cc: (bcc: Security/CT/ERNotes)
>
>
>
> Subject: Port scanning Detection
>
>
> Is there a software package for NT? All my searching has only found Perl
> compiled programs. I cannot seem to figure out how to get ActivePerl to
> work.
> -
> [To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
> "unsubscribe firewalls" in the body of the message.]
>
> -
> [To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
> "unsubscribe firewalls" in the body of the message.]
-
[To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
"unsubscribe firewalls" in the body of the message.]
