On Fri, 15 Oct 1999, Drennan, Richard wrote:

> NAT would be needed.

Not if the firewall had either an application-layer gateway capable of 
proxying the connection or even a circuit-level gateway such as plug-gw.

NAT is only necessary if the firewall is a packet-filtering device, not 
if it's an application layer gateway.  

Paul
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Paul D. Robertson      "My statements in this message are personal opinions
[EMAIL PROTECTED]      which may have no basis whatsoever in fact."
                                                                     PSB#9280

-
[To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
"unsubscribe firewalls" in the body of the message.]

Reply via email to